The Top Reasons Not To Take the Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines
An Updated List Of Problems With the Mainstream Narrative
For those of you who are having discussions with employers and relatives over the experimental vaccines, I have put together the following list I plan to keep updated as new data comes out, linking to the relevant articles discussing the topic in detail.
I primarily focus on the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for now since it is the one that has BLA approval and the most publicly available data. And remember, all of the hard data comes from people in whose best interest it is to promote the vaccine. This is their best case with every trick in the book probably utilized to put lipstick on the pig. We have no idea how many events were intentionally downgraded behind the scenes to make everything look safer. That is what a functioning FDA would be doing if they were not a subsidiary of big pharma these days.
Here is a risk reward table to supplement the analysis based on what we know about the Pfizer vaccine from their own trials and FDA documents. Citations of each piece of data referenced and screenshots are given in the linked articles below elsewhere on this site:
Pfizer’s own registration studies show a 41.6% increased relative risk of severe adverse outcomes compared with placebo even adjusting for times on treatment, which is highly statistically significant. To put this in perspective, the control arm risk of severe COVID-19 over the same time frame was only 0.13% while the excess risk of a severe adverse event was 0.51%.
All coronavirus vaccines in the past never made it past animal trials due to pathogenic priming causing vaccinated individuals to do worse than the unvaccinated when exposed to variants. The high rates of COVID-19 hospitalization rates in highly vaccinated countries and the recent Lancet study referenced in point 8 below suggest this could be occurring. In fact, I believe that the only valid reason for recommending a third dose of the same vaccine in less than a year is that researchers secretly suspect antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a mechanism for pathogenic priming, is in effect. Otherwise, there is no reason to give the same vaccine to the same person less than a year after two prior doses. If it were a different vaccine there would be an argument; but, there is no reason antibody titers have to be kept at an artificially high level unless there were some ADE suspected.
The manufacturers have no liability for these vaccines. If they do not think them safe enough to stand behind, then you should consider them unsafe as well. I do not want to take any vaccine if the manufacturer has no incentive to make them safe. If the government wants to seriously reduce “vaccine hesitancy” maybe they should deal with the vaccine liability issue first. The Moderna vaccine literally has already killed two people due to purely manufacturing errors.
Pfizer’s own registration studies show what I calculate to be a 33.7% risk of having such a severe reaction after the first or second dose, that you have to take pain medicines or antipyretics. Basically one in three people who get the jab, feel so sick they have to self medicate!
Pfizer’s own registration studies show an excess adverse event rate of 15.4% over control versus only a 4.03% excess risk of getting COVID-19 in the vaccine arm versus control. We also have no idea how many of these adverse events were downgraded from severe or serious, the same way a COVID-19 pneumonia death was not classified as severe COVID-19 in the studies.
Pfizer’s own registration studies show a 24% increase in risk of death versus control. While not statistically significant, the separation between the two arms is double the 0.025% annualized mortality risk from severe COVID-19 shown in the placebo arm in the last data we have. If you are worried by really small numbers like COVID-19 deaths, the excess deaths in the vaccine arm should concern you even more given the difference in total deaths is four times the difference in COVID-19 related deaths between the two arms based on the last breakdown we saw from Pfizer (when it was 15 versus 14, and the updated breakdown was not put in an FDA document after the approval).
The FDA does not appear to have seriously reviewed Pfizer’s clinical package given there is a glaring massive mistake in the secondary endpoint data. Thus we have to seriously question how many events were properly classified. The recent resignation of the top two officials overseeing vaccines, which is rumored to be over their objections to what is going on in pushing untested third jabs, further demonstrates politicization of the FDA has gotten out of hand. Until there is an independent review of the data or full transparency on every single adverse event catalogued, no one should consider taking this vaccine.
There is no long term follow up on any of these vaccines, and there will never be truly blinded long term follow up because vaccine companies like Pfizer aggressively crossed over patients and blinded the studies. The original plan was for a 2 year study with the Pfizer vaccine. The trial was unblinded when the average follow up was 4.5 months in the vaccine arm and 4.3 months in control. Anyone taking this now is a human guinea pig worried about only a 0.025% annualized risk of mortality from COVID-19 when excess vaccine deaths are running higher than that.
These vaccines are new technologies, with a very checkered past, that have not been used in large numbers of healthy patients before. Thus there is an even more important need for that long term follow up referenced in point 8. These are the first mRNA vaccines to ever receive FDA approval, and they did so with not even 18 months of development and testing for the approved product. The gene therapy vaccines (Johnson & Johnson and Astra Zeneca which are recombinant adenovirus vectors introducing foreign DNA into your cells) are even potentially more problematic given the horrible safety record two decades ago when they first started to be used in humans and unknown long-term consequences of gene modification in humans. The FDA used to have a Recombinant DNA Advisory Commission (RAC) that kept a strict leash on this technology and they were conveniently given a much reduced role in 2019, right before these vaccines were rolled out. Convenient timing like that and the “Event 201” coronavirus pandemic simulation in late 2019, make me even more uncomfortable about what is going on with this vaccine.
A recent Lancet study showed a 32% increased risk of hospitalization or emergency care if you got both vaccinations compared to people who only got one vaccination or who were never vaccinated. The difference in this large observational study was highly statistically significant and demonstrates that the narrative that getting vaccinated prevents you from getting more severe disease appears to be a lie in practice. This begs to question how many serious COVID-19 cases were actually classified as severe adverse events instead of severe COVID-19 in the trial results (at least two from non-confirmed by RT-PCR cases we know of from page 42 of the VRBPAC meeting data). It is also possible antigenic drift and resulting antibody dependent enhancement has shifted the risk profile against the vaccine since the early trials.
VAERS data of vaccine adverse events is showing the most disturbing trends in the history of its existence. We know that VAERS data is systemically under-reported since most doctors are unfamiliar with how to do so and most are out of hand likely to assume certain events are not vaccine related. A good article on this and the true difficulty of assessing VAERS data can be found here. Please note that the post vaccine death rate per dose estimate reported in the article of 0.018%, which would be 0.036% for both jabs, is much higher than the 0.009% death rate from COVID-19 in the placebo arm after 4.3 months. Let that sink in for a second.
While anecdotal, it is disturbing given what we have seen in Pfizer’ trials and how the FDA rubber stamped their data and the full court press to censor people with COVID-19 vaccine injuries. The VAERS profile of this vaccine is exponentially worse than the swine flu vaccine pulled for safety reasons in 1976. There is also a whistleblower who has come forward to say that the data is being dramatically under-reported based on a search of the CMS database for deaths within 3 days of the vaccine. Another whistleblower I link to in a video report below states that they are seeing tons of vaccine side effects and to her knowledge no one is reporting them to VAERS at her hospital.
Everyone should be concerned by this, especially since the only way deaths do not become “anecdotal” is to have an actual intent to treat placebo control group. That control group was crossed over to get vaccine at an average of 4.3 months post treatment right when there was a 24% increase in deaths in the vaccine arm. So we will never get the true answer unless the death numbers become so noticeable that even the anecdotes are highly convincing. That is why Pfizer should have been required by the FDA to complete the entire 2 year study before the BLA was ever granted and we started giving this to massive numbers of people!
Antigenic drift will likely make any vaccine to this disease rapidly useless, necessitating and endless barrage of “updates” the the vaccine, each having its own risk of vaccine injury in otherwise healthy individuals. This appears to have already happened in highly vaccinated countries like Israel that have orders of magnitude more cases in summer when respiratory diseases are supposed to be lowest versus relatively unvaccinated populations in winter like Paraguay.
Mass censorship and a blatantly biased establishment media regarding the vaccines should make you suspect the worst about the vaccines. People only cut off debate when they know they cannot win a logical argument. They literally are censoring people’s actual experiences of vaccine injury and simple quotes of Pfizer’s clinical data (like the Tweet from Alex Berenson stating 15 deaths in the vaccine arm versus 14 deaths in placebo from data Pfizer presented a month ago before we got the most recent data that was worse). No one should take anything that dishonest agents of influence are trying to cram down their throats like this. What are they afraid of? The truth? Are they afraid the drug companies would cut off billions of ad dollars if they do not toe the line? What are they hiding?
There appears to be a very nefarious agenda behind these vaccines. The medical establishment rushed through clinical trials with reckless abandon. The medical establishment lied about the protective ability of masks. The medical establishment did its best to undermine cheap effective treatments for COVID-19, with the Lancet going so far as to publish a negative study on hydroxychloroquine that was based on obviously fake data! The NIH pulled randomized trials on the drug right after that fake study, but never re-instated it when it was embarrassingly retracted shortly thereafter. And, now governments are recommending third shots without any randomized prospective studies with long term follow up while pushing Nazi vaccine mandates in blatant violation of the Nuremberg convention. When governments, the media establishment, and the mainstream media make conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones start to look geniuses, you should resist any effect to force these vaccines on you.
I would not put anything past people that pathologically lie like this. If you did want to implement a “mark of the beast” 666 system to control who buys and sells, this is how you would introduce it. Look at France where people cannot even buy things at shopping centers without their mark. Any Christian who will take an experimental gene therapy with no long term followup or even just fake it with a fake proof of vaccination just to save their job or be able go shopping will gladly take the 666 if and when it follows shortly thereafter. I mean how many of these people who are not supposed to “fear death” but to “put faith in God” are cowering over that 0.025% annualized mortality rate, putting more faith in proven liars like Dr. Anthony Fauci and the gang of criminals run by China at the WHO?
Hospital whistleblowers have come forward to expose that (1) the vast influx of new patients at hospitals in the US is not from COVID-19 but from the myriad of vaccine injuries that have been sustained as a result of vaccinations and (2) COVID-19 patients are being given therapies and treatments known to be toxic and lethal while effective medicines with decades of known safety data like ivermectin are being avoided. Here is a prime example:
Not being an eyewitness, I have no idea if these reports are true. But given the unprecedented mass censorship and deceptive practices adopted by the medical establishment, government, and the media, these reports are highly believable. And given the large number of adverse events in the vaccine trials relative to the actual effective treatment effect, it would be totally consistent with the data the FDA and pharmaceutical shill doctors decided to ignore.
We should know soon enough though. If 50% of workers at some hospitals who refuse to get the vaccine because they have seen the effects up close and person resign when forced to do as claimed in that video, that will be pretty hard to cover up. Nurses will then have no reason to be anonymous in their testimonies and there will be plenty of people coming forward to expose their hospitals for these crimes against humanity.
I predict there will be a new round of Nuremberg trials in the coming months and years when the full measure of these crimes against humanity are known. And if the conspiracy theorists are right, and they have been pretty spot on in their predictions of what would happen since this started, the corporate elite will very shortly intentionally crash the markets and create artificial food shortages around the world to distract people from the vaccine side effects and get them so focused on surviving that they will take whatever vaccine or “mark” is forced upon them; that is, unless the people stand up in defiance in the spirit of 1776 against any government that imposes Nazi measures such as vaccine passports on the population.